Manufacturing News
September 15, 2026
September 15, 2026 · Statewide · Story 2 of 4
D.C. Circuit Campbell Ruling: What It Means for NIPSCO Schahfer Costs
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled unanimously Friday that the Department of Energy exceeded its authority under the Federal Power Act when it forced Consumers Energy's J.H. Campbell coal plant in Michigan to stay open past its scheduled May 2025 retirement. The court found, in Judge Cornelia Pillard's words, "no emergency within the meaning" of the statute.
That ruling is now the leading appellate precedent directly on point for the parallel April 2026 legal challenges targeting NIPSCO's Schahfer Units 17 and 18 and CenterPoint's Culley Unit 2 in Indiana. Whether it formally binds those cases depends on venue and procedural posture, but no court reviewing DOE's Section 202(c) authority can now ignore Pillard's reasoning.
Here is the operational reality that makes this worse than most people realize. CenterPoint reported to DOE that Culley Unit 2 was fully available for only five of its first 48 days under the emergency order, and MISO never called on it during those five days. NIPSCO's public MISO outage disclosures indicate both Schahfer units were expected to be unavailable for most or all of the third 90-day order period. The DOE's reliability justification is undermined not just legally, but by the utilities' own reported numbers.
NIPSCO has already filed to recover $38 million from customers for just the first three months of forced Schahfer operation. The company previously estimated keeping Schahfer beyond 2025 could require more than one billion dollars in spending due to chronic mechanical failures on aging equipment. That figure dwarfs Michigan's $259 million price tag at Campbell, and it has received almost no public attention. Map how the fuel adjustment clause tracker flows those costs into your rate schedule before a retroactive cost-recovery proceeding at FERC or the IURC prices it for you.
For the fuel adjustment clause mechanics behind forced-operation cost recovery, see Fuel Adjustment Charges: What Indiana C&I Operators Need to Know About This Line Item on Your Electric Bill.
For your morning huddle
- Q
NIPSCO has been recovering Schahfer forced-operation costs through my bill. Does the D.C. Circuit Campbell ruling stop that?
The Campbell ruling removes the primary legal authority DOE cited to order Schahfer to stay open, but cost recovery for amounts already incurred is a separate proceeding at FERC and the IURC. Map your fuel adjustment clause tracker now so you know your exposure before a retroactive proceeding prices it for you.
From the brief, September 15, 2026
- HEA 1002 Multi-Year Rate Framework: Duke Files by December, and Tracker Consolidation Is the Entire Ballgame
- D.C. Circuit Campbell Ruling: What It Means for NIPSCO Schahfer Costs
- EPA Greenhouse Gas Repeal: Does Coal Extension Lower Indiana Electricity Prices?
- NWS Crane Microreactor: Indiana's First Nuclear Reactor and Supply Chain Timing
TEG Daily, before your morning huddle
A short Indiana energy and manufacturing scan, delivered before the workday starts.
Related
- Fed Rate Hike Hits Indiana Manufacturers as PJM Capacity Costs Surge | TEG Daily September 16, 2026
- Small Modular Reactors and Microreactors for Commercial & Industrial Power: What Operators Need to Diligence Before Signing Anything
- IURC Opens Investigation Into Indiana Utility Tracker Charges, What It Means for Your Power Bill
Manufacturers Energy Grant Program
Free for Indiana manufacturers
Manufacturers from qualifying Indiana counties receive a free monthly 35-point audit of their electric bills for cost recovery and savings. Every line item checked and validated, every opportunity found comes with a step-by-step guide to capture it.
EDCs: sponsor this program and it carries your organization's name For economic developers →

